Not every hair transplant clinic is the right fit for every patient. Clinics typically specialize in one primary technique (FUE, FUT, or DHI), and matching your case to the right specialization is one of the most important decisions you will make. A clinic that performs 90% FUE procedures will naturally be more skilled at FUE than a clinic that splits evenly between three techniques.
This guide compares clinic specialization types, helps you determine which fits your case, and identifies the red flags specific to each technique category.
The Three Major Technique Categories
FUE (Follicular Unit Extraction)
FUE involves extracting individual follicular units directly from the donor area using a micro-punch tool (0.7-1.0mm diameter).
| Specification | Detail |
|---|---|
| Scar type | Small dot scars (nearly invisible at short hair lengths) |
| Recovery | 7-10 days |
| Max grafts per session | Up to 5,000 |
| Graft survival rate | 90-95% |
| Donor shaving | Required (partial shaving possible in some cases) |
| Cost per graft (US) | $4-6 |
| Cost per graft (Turkey) | $1-2 |
| Best for | Norwood 2-5, patients wanting minimal visible scarring |
FUT (Follicular Unit Transplantation / Strip Method)
FUT removes a strip of tissue from the donor area, and individual follicular units are dissected under microscopy.
| Specification | Detail |
|---|---|
| Scar type | Linear scar (concealable with hair at 1+ inch length) |
| Recovery | 10-14 days |
| Max grafts per session | Up to 4,000 |
| Graft survival rate | 90-95% |
| Donor shaving | Not required |
| Cost per graft (US) | $3-5 |
| Cost per graft (Turkey) | $0.80-1.50 |
| Best for | Norwood 5-7, patients needing maximum graft yield from a single session |
DHI (Direct Hair Implantation)
DHI uses Choi implanter pens to extract and place grafts in a single step, without pre-creating recipient channels.
| Specification | Detail |
|---|---|
| Scar type | Minimal dot scars |
| Recovery | 7-10 days |
| Max grafts per session | Up to 3,500 |
| Graft survival rate | 90-95% |
| Donor shaving | Partial or full |
| Tool | Choi Implanter Pen |
| Cost per graft (US) | $5-8 |
| Cost per graft (Turkey) | $1.50-3 |
| Best for | Density refinement, smaller sessions, patients wanting no pre-made channels |
Matching Your Case to a Specialization
Your Norwood stage, graft needs, and personal priorities determine which clinic specialization is the best match.
FUE Clinics Are Best When:
- You are Norwood 2-5 (needing 800-4,500 grafts)
- You want to wear your hair short without visible scarring
- You want faster recovery (return to work in 5-7 days)
- You may want body or beard hair extraction as a supplementary donor source
- You prefer a less invasive procedure
FUT Clinics Are Best When:
- You are Norwood 5-7 (needing 3,000-7,500 grafts)
- You need the maximum number of grafts from a single session
- You always wear your hair at least 1 inch long (to conceal the linear scar)
- Donor density is limited and every graft matters
- You want lower per-graft cost
DHI Clinics Are Best When:
- You need targeted density work in specific areas (hairline refinement, temple points)
- You are having a smaller session (under 3,500 grafts)
- You want simultaneous channel creation and graft placement
- You prefer no shaving or partial shaving of the donor area
- You are adding density to an area with existing hair (less trauma to surrounding follicles)
Red Flags by Clinic Specialization
Red Flags at FUE-Focused Clinics
Claiming FUE is always superior to FUT. This is a marketing statement, not a medical fact. For high-graft-count Norwood 6-7 cases, FUT often produces better outcomes because it yields more grafts per session and preserves donor area capacity for future procedures. A clinic that dismisses FUT entirely may be prioritizing what they do best rather than what is best for your case.
Using large punch tools (above 1.0mm). Modern FUE uses 0.7-1.0mm punches. Larger punches increase scarring and transection rates. Ask specifically about punch diameter during consultation.
No mention of donor area management. FUE thins the donor area diffusely. A responsible FUE clinic discusses donor density preservation and the 45% safe extraction limit to prevent visible donor thinning.
Mega-session promises without caveats. Sessions of 4,000-5,000 grafts in a single FUE session are possible but require longer procedures (8-12 hours) and excellent graft storage. The clinic should explain how they maintain graft viability during extended sessions.
Red Flags at FUT-Focused Clinics
Not discussing the linear scar. Every FUT procedure leaves a linear scar. A clinic that minimizes this or claims "scarless FUT" is being dishonest. The scar can be well-hidden by hair but it exists permanently.
No trichophytic closure technique. Modern FUT clinics use trichophytic closure, where one wound edge is trimmed to allow hair to grow through the scar, making it thinner and less visible. If a clinic does not mention or use this technique, they may produce wider, more visible scars.
No microscopic graft dissection. FUT grafts must be dissected from the donor strip under stereoscopic microscopy. Clinics that dissect grafts without magnification produce higher transection rates and lower graft quality.
Refusing to discuss FUE as an alternative. Just as FUE clinics should not dismiss FUT, FUT clinics should not dismiss FUE. The best approach depends on the patient, and a clinic pushing only its preferred technique is prioritizing its own workflow.
Red Flags at DHI-Focused Clinics
Claiming DHI is a completely different procedure from FUE. DHI is a variation of FUE that uses Choi implanter pens instead of pre-made recipient channels. The extraction phase is identical. Clinics that market DHI as a radically different technology are overstating the distinction.
Recommending DHI for high-graft-count sessions. DHI is generally limited to 3,500 grafts per session because the Choi pen implantation process is slower and more labor-intensive. A Norwood 5-7 patient needing 4,000-7,500 grafts may require multiple DHI sessions or would be better served by FUE or FUT.
Charging a large premium over FUE without clear justification. DHI costs slightly more than FUE because the implanter pens are expensive and the technique requires additional training. But a 50-100% premium suggests the clinic is using DHI as a marketing upsell rather than a clinical recommendation.
Using a single Choi pen needle size for all grafts. Follicular units come in 1-hair, 2-hair, 3-hair, and occasionally 4-hair groupings. Each requires a different needle diameter in the implanter pen. A clinic using one size for all is compressing larger grafts or creating oversized channels for smaller ones.
Multi-Technique Clinics: Pros and Cons
Some clinics offer all three techniques. This can be an advantage or a red flag depending on execution.
Advantages of Multi-Technique Clinics
- Can match the technique to your specific case rather than defaulting to their only option
- Able to combine techniques (FUT strip + FUE extraction in the same session for maximum yield)
- More flexible in treating complex cases (previous procedures, limited donor, high Norwood stages)
Red Flags at Multi-Technique Clinics
- Surgeon does not personally specialize in all offered techniques. Ask which technique the surgeon performs most frequently and which they would choose for their own procedure
- Different surgeons for different techniques without disclosure. You should know which surgeon handles your case and which technique they are personally most experienced with
- Upselling more expensive techniques without clinical reasoning. If the clinic pushes DHI at $8/graft when FUE at $5/graft would produce identical results for your case, they are optimizing revenue, not outcomes
How to Evaluate a Clinic's Technique Expertise
Questions to Ask During Consultation
- What percentage of your procedures use [FUE/FUT/DHI]?
- How many [FUE/FUT/DHI] procedures has the lead surgeon performed in their career?
- What is your documented graft survival rate for this technique?
- Why do you recommend this specific technique for my case?
- What are the limitations of this technique for my situation?
- Would a different technique potentially produce better results for me?
- Can you show me 5+ before/after cases using this technique on patients with a similar Norwood stage?
Data Points to Compare Across Clinics
| Metric | What to Compare |
|---|---|
| Annual procedure volume | Higher volume correlates with more experience |
| Technique-specific graft survival rate | Should be 90-95% minimum |
| Average graft count per session | Should align with your needs |
| Complication rate | Should be transparently disclosed |
| Revision rate | Lower is better; under 5% is strong |
| Years performing this technique | 5+ years minimum |
Making Your Decision
The right clinic technique match depends on your individual case. A Norwood 3 patient who wears short hair is naturally suited to an FUE specialist. A Norwood 6 patient needing 5,000+ grafts may benefit from a FUT specialist or a multi-technique clinic that can combine approaches.
What matters most is that the clinic's recommendation aligns with your clinical needs rather than their business model. If a clinic only performs FUE and you are a clear FUT candidate, they should tell you that and refer you elsewhere. A clinic that recommends its own technique regardless of patient suitability is a clinic to avoid.
For a broader perspective on evaluating clinics across all categories, read the complete clinic red flags overview. To understand the equipment that supports each technique, review the technology and equipment standards guide.
Establish your Norwood stage and graft estimate before any consultation using the free AI assessment at myhairline.ai/analyze. Knowing your numbers gives you the data to evaluate whether a clinic's technique recommendation truly fits your case.
Medical disclaimer: This article provides general educational information about hair transplant techniques and clinic specialization. It is not medical advice. Always consult with a board-certified hair restoration surgeon for personalized technique recommendations.