Norwood Scale

Norwood 3A Hair Loss Tracking: Frontal Recession Without Crown Involvement

February 23, 20266 min read1,200 words

Norwood 3A patients may have a better long-term prognosis than those at Norwood 3 vertex because the crown remains unaffected. This distinction changes your graft count estimates, treatment targets, and overall approach. Without zone-specific tracking that separates frontal data from crown data, the two patterns get lumped together and you lose critical planning information.

This guide explains how to track the Norwood 3A pattern with independent zone measurements that confirm your classification and guide treatment.

Understanding the 3A vs 3V Distinction

Both Norwood 3A and 3 vertex (3V) show significant temple and frontal recession. The difference is what happens at the crown.

FeatureNorwood 3ANorwood 3V
Frontal recessionSignificant, deep templesSignificant, deep temples
Crown/vertexNormal density preservedVisible thinning at whorl
Total grafts if transplanted1,500-2,2002,000-2,800
Treatment zonesFrontal onlyFrontal + crown
PrognosisBetter (single-zone loss)More complex (dual-zone)

The graft difference between 3A and 3V can mean $2,000 to $6,000 in cost savings depending on your region. In the USA at $4 to $6 per graft, that 600-graft difference translates to $2,400 to $3,600. In Turkey at $1 to $2 per graft, the savings are $600 to $1,200.

Step 1: Confirm Your 3A Classification

You need two independent measurements to confirm Norwood 3A.

Frontal measurement: Take a clear frontal photo showing your full hairline from temple to temple. The AI maps your hairline position and measures frontal zone density. At Norwood 3A, you will see deep temple recession forming a clear M-shape with the frontal midline also receded.

Crown measurement: Take a top-down photo centered on the crown whorl. The AI measures density per cm2 in a radius around the whorl. At Norwood 3A, this measurement should be within normal range for your ethnicity.

EthnicityNormal Crown Density3A Threshold (above this = 3A)
Caucasian170-230 FU/cm2155+ FU/cm2
Asian140-200 FU/cm2130+ FU/cm2
African120-180 FU/cm2110+ FU/cm2
Hispanic145-195 FU/cm2135+ FU/cm2

If your crown density falls below the threshold, you may actually be at Norwood 3V rather than 3A. This reclassification affects your treatment plan.

Step 2: Set Up Dual-Zone Tracking

Track the frontal and crown zones as separate data streams in myhairline.ai/analyze. This is the most important tracking setup decision at Norwood 3A because the entire classification depends on one zone being affected while the other is not.

Frontal zone tracking (monthly):

  • Hairline position from brow ridge at midline, left temple, and right temple
  • Density per cm2 in the frontal band (hairline to 4 cm behind)
  • Any new miniaturization visible in the frontal zone

Crown zone tracking (monthly):

  • Density per cm2 at and around the crown whorl
  • Whorl diameter (expanding whorl suggests emerging vertex loss)
  • Comparison to your crown baseline

Step 3: Watch for Pattern Conversion

The key risk at Norwood 3A is conversion to 3V or progression to Norwood 4. Your dual-zone data catches both transitions early.

3A to 3V conversion: Crown density drops more than 10% from baseline while frontal recession continues. This means the crown is now involved, upgrading your classification to 3V and increasing potential graft needs from 1,500-2,200 to 2,000-2,800.

3A to Norwood 4 progression: Frontal recession deepens significantly, the midline hairline moves further back, and the M-shape becomes more pronounced. At Norwood 4, graft requirements jump to 2,500-3,500.

Stable 3A: Frontal zone density stable or slowly declining while crown density holds steady. This is the best scenario and suggests your crown may remain unaffected long-term.

Step 4: Target Treatment to the Frontal Zone

Since 3A is a frontal-only pattern, treatment can be more focused than at 3V.

Finasteride (1mg daily): Works systemically to block DHT, protecting both the frontal zone and preventing future crown involvement. Halts further loss in 80-90% of men and produces regrowth in 65%. Side effects in only 2-4% of users. This is the primary defense at Norwood 3A.

Topical minoxidil (5%, twice daily): Apply to the frontal zone and temples specifically. Produces moderate regrowth in 40-60% of users within 4 to 6 months. Since your crown does not need treatment at 3A, you use less product per application.

PRP therapy: Targeted injections into the frontal zone at $500 to $2,000 per session. Clinical studies show 30-40% density increase over 3 to 4 sessions. Focusing sessions on the frontal zone only may reduce per-session costs.

TreatmentMonthly CostFrontal Zone FocusTimeline to Results
Finasteride$10-30 (generic)Systemic, protects all zones3-6 months
Minoxidil 5%$15-40Apply to frontal only4-6 months
PRP$125-500 (amortized)Inject frontal zone only3-4 sessions over 3-6 months

Step 5: Transplant Planning for 3A

If you decide to pursue a hair transplant at Norwood 3A, your planning benefits from zone-specific data.

A surgeon needs to know your frontal zone density loss, your crown density (to confirm it does not need grafts), and your donor area density. With 1,500 to 2,200 grafts needed, this is well within a single FUE session (up to 5,000 grafts max) or a single FUT session (up to 4,000 grafts max).

FUE recovery takes 7 to 10 days. Graft survival rates run 90-95%. Because 3A only requires frontal work, surgery time is shorter and recovery is focused on one area.

Get Your Zone-Specific Classification

Upload your frontal and crown photos at myhairline.ai/analyze to confirm whether you are 3A or 3V. The distinction affects your graft count, cost estimate, and treatment plan.

This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional before starting any hair loss treatment.

FAQ

What distinguishes Norwood 3A from Norwood 3 vertex?

Norwood 3A has significant frontal and temple recession without crown thinning. Norwood 3 vertex (3V) has both temple recession and a distinct area of thinning at the crown. The prognosis for 3A is often better because the crown remains intact, meaning fewer total grafts are needed if transplantation is pursued.

Should Norwood 3A treatment focus differently from Norwood 3 vertex?

Yes. Norwood 3A treatment targets the frontal zone exclusively since the crown is not involved. This means fewer grafts (1,500 to 2,200 versus 2,000 to 2,800 for 3V), lower transplant costs, and a more focused medication application area for topical treatments like minoxidil.

How do I set up zone-specific tracking to monitor Norwood 3A vs 3 vertex?

Track the frontal zone and crown zone as separate measurements in myhairline.ai. Upload frontal photos and top-down crown photos independently. If your frontal zone shows recession while your crown density stays within 5% of baseline, you have confirmed the 3A classification.

Frequently Asked Questions

Norwood 3A has significant frontal and temple recession without crown thinning. Norwood 3 vertex (3V) has both temple recession and a distinct area of thinning at the crown. The prognosis for 3A is often better because the crown remains intact, meaning fewer total grafts are needed if transplantation is pursued.

Ready to Assess Your Hair Loss?

Get an AI-powered Norwood classification and personalized graft estimate in 30 seconds. No downloads, no account required.

Start Free Analysis